Build complex toys and simple tools
by Tony Karp
DMC-FZ18 - Raw vs JPEG - The JPEG Manifesto
 - Sky race - Panasonic DMC-FZ18 - contrails against a dramatic evening sky - Tony Karp, design, art, photography, techno-impressionist, techno-impressionism, aerial photography , drone , drones , dji , mavic pro , video , 3D printing - Books -
Sky race - Panasonic DMC-FZ18
Doctor: I've given you a very thorough checkup, Mr. Jones. The best thing for you would be to give up drinking, smoking, and sex. Yes, Mr. Jones, that would be the best thing.

Mr. Jones: I don't deserve the best, doctor. What's second best?

Up until now, the Raw vs JPEG debate has been rather one-sided. In this article, I am going to attempt to level the playing field by presenting some arguments in favor of JPEGs and showing some of the problems with Raw format. You will find that JPEGs, like Rodney Dangerfield, "don't get no respect." If you mention that you prefer the convenience of shooting in JPEG format, you will probably get that sort of response.

I will start with a statement that represents the central philosophy of my argument.

The image quality of the JPEG files produced by the Panasonic DMC-FZ18, with a few one-time tweaks to the camera settings, is as good or better than the average person can achieve using Raw format and the subsequent processing involved.

One of the factors that makes this debate interesting is that the DMC-FZ18 has internal processing that automatically fixes the camera's faults when saving its files in JPEG format. In my last two articles, I talked about how the DMC-FZ18's barrel distortion and color fringing were fixed transparently. For Raw shooters, you're going to have evaluate each and every picture to quantify the presence of these faults and then fix them on your own by tweaking your Raw development software.

After these posts, I received a few comments pointing out how these faults could be easily fixed by using the manufacturer's software or another program. But why bother? Why spend this effort doing something the camera is already doing on its own? And, since the in-camera processing is finely tuned to fix these problems, there's always the chance that your finest efforts won't be as good.

When automatic transmissions first became available, they were inefficient and lacked the performance of manual transmissions. But automatic transmissions got better and better and, for the average driver, are now as good as a manual transmission and far more convenient. But there are still some who insist that the manual transmissions are better and refuse to even try driving with an automatic transmission.

When Raw format was first made available, it was superior to JPEG format in a number of ways. But Raw format has, by definition, stayed the same, while JPEGs have gotten better and better. The JPEGs produced by the DMC-FZ18 are very high quality, the camera settings can be tweaked to make them even better, and they automatically fix a number of faults. But there are people who will buy this fine camera and go directly to Raw processing without ever testing the JPEG format to see how good it is.

So while JPEG quality has gone from good enough to very good to excellent, the Raw crowd has been too busy exchanging their favorite Raw developer settings to notice that their time has passed. In their search for the ultimate in image quality their interest has become an obsession. At some point we have to realize that pictures are more important than pixels.

The dark side of the raw We've heard all of the advantages of shooting in Raw format. Here are some of the disadvantages.

The first problem is that the proponents of Raw processing make it sound easy. It's not. You're going to have to fiddle and tweak every photo you take, fixing the camera's problems on your own, until you get a result that compares favorably with the JPEG. This can be a time consuming process. At, say two minutes per picture, you will spend over three hours processing just 100 pictures. Even if you do it faster, it's still going to consume time that could be better spent elsewhere.

Raw files slow you down when shooting. Forget any sort of action sports, burst shooting, or even just taking pictures as fast as you want to. The FZ18's Raw storage speed is pretty fast, less than three seconds per shot, but that's pretty slow when compared to JPEG. And as for the Raw storage speed on my older digital cameras, you basically take a break after every shot.

Raw files increase the complexity in file handling. I shoot JPEGs. There's just the one file, which contains the image and the technical data about the picture. I'll take one of these files and put it into one of the many photo-editing programs I use and start playing. Each time I get a new result, I save it as a TIFF. Life is simple. It's just JPEGs and TIFFs.

Not so for the RAW shooter. We start with the Raw format file (different format for every camera) and put it into the Raw "development" software. You can save your developed image as a TIFF, and it will also save a separate little file with information about the picture, also in a proprietary format. Now I have three files instead of one. But what if you've used another program to correct the lens distortion? Now you have four files for your one picture. And all of this to get to the point where I started with my JPEG file.

Raw files are memory hogs on both the camera and in the computer. If I pop a 4 gigabyte card into my DMC-FZ18 and set the camera For JPEG Fine, it says there's room for 1000 pictures. More than enough for a day's shooting. If I set the camera to save in Raw format, it says 229 pictures, less than 25% of the number for JPEGs, and certainly not enough for a day's shooting. Yes, you can carry another card, but that's an awful lot of space for these few images.

Now say that you put your 229 Raw files on the computer, develop them, and save them as compressed TIFFs. We're now talking about roughly 28 megabytes per picture, even before we've begun to explore post processing. Your 229 "developed" files, along with the Raw originals will take up about 6.5 gigabytes, compared with the approximately 850 megabytes required for the equivalent number of JPEG files.

Between the time lost in the shooting, the larger memory and disk space requirements, and the extra processing required the folks who shoot Raw format tend to take fewer pictures in a given situation. This may, in fact, be a good thing. But with Raw format you won't have the freedom of choice that the person who shoots JPEGs has.

But there's yet another factor. If I use three different digital cameras and save my files as JPEGs, I can treat them all the same, putting them together in the same album program and using the same software to post process them.

But if I have three digital cameras and decide to use Raw format, the situation changes dramatically. Each camera will have a different Raw format. Each camera will require different software and different processing. Each camera will have faults such as lens aberrations and color fringing that will have to be treated specially for that camera. And the Raw-processing software that comes with the camera may have its own album program, so it will be a real problem if I want to store these files together with the pictures from my other cameras.

And what sort of Raw processing, and what special Raw-handling software will your next digital camera require?

Now, if you decide to shoot JPEGs, what are you going to do with all of the time saved by not fiddling with Raw processing? Well, you could be out taking pictures. Or, you could be working on your JPEG files in a photo editing program, polishing them to their final glory. The Raw shooter has to jump a number of hurdles before even getting to the point where the JPEG user begins their work.

If you've been searching this page for extreme blow-ups or some other photos that prove my point, don't bother. There have been numerous examples of the superiority of Raw format posted in the online forums. Most of them are enlargements showing how, with Raw processing, you might get a one percent improvement in overall quality.

But none of this matters. What matters is that you, as a photographer, are more than capable of making this judgment on your own by examining your own photographs.

Here's what to do. Go to a place that you are familiar with, one that you have photographed before. Go out one day and just shoot in Raw format. Go out on another day and just shoot JPEGs.

Now work with these files and compare the results on your own. Most examples demonstrating the superiority of Raw format are done by experienced photographers who have put a lot of time and effort into this, so don't be surprised if you can't match their results. What you should also evaluate besides the technical quality of the results is whether Raw processing suits you personally and how it suits your own requirements. Did you find any benefit that was worth the effort involved? Will you see a real difference given the size of the prints you usually make? Is it worth the added complexity? Is it worth the extra memory and disk space requirements?

You may find, like me, that the DMC-FZ18's JPEGs are all you need.

Today's advice: Never mistake a geek for a guru.

Addendum: If you've read this far, thanks for your patience. I just wanted to review the main points.

1. This article is not about the superiority of the Raw or JPEG format. It is about having a balanced discussion.

2. Raw shooting is being sold by some as a miracle cure for whatever ails your pictures. Shooting Raw is not as easy as it sounds. I have attempted to point out some disadvantages that aren't normally discussed.

3. The Panasonic DMC-FZ18 produces very good JPEGs and you really ought to try them before going directly to Raw. As a bonus, the DMC-FZ18's JPEG processing automatically fixes things like barrel distortion and color fringing that the Raw folks will have to fix on their own.

4.JPEGs are not written in stone. You can apply the same sort of corrections to them that are used to justify Raw.

5. Rather than relying on tests or demonstrations by others, you should try this comparison of methods for yourself and then make your own decision. You should evaluate not just the results, but the complexity and effort you took to achieve them.

6. There are only so many hours in a day. You can spend them learning the various settings in your Raw software or you can spend them learning to use the various settings on your camera. Which will yield the biggest dividend?


And finally, something to meditate on.

If the Raw format is so good and so important to quality, how come there is no industry standard for Raw files, as there is for JPEG and TIFF files? How come every manufacturer has their own format for Raw? And given this, how come there's a different format for individual camera models from the same manufacturer? It's like the early days of computers, before there were standards for things like fonts and printers.
< Previous Nov 2, 2007 Next >
Copyright 1958-2017 Tony & Marilyn Karp
Web Site Design
Systems Design
The Future
About
About Tony Karp
Recent Entries
The value of time in the creative process
Variations on a skink
Andy shoots raw. Ann always shoots JPEG
A butterfly in Havana -- From start to finish
Recovering highlight detail in JPEG images
A tribute to Paris on November 14, 2015
Some black and white pictures from long ago
Panasonic DMC-ZS40 pictures - Part 2
Panasonic DMC-ZS40 pictures - Part 1
Art in the 3rd Dimension -- A butterfly takes wing
Shooting for NBC
What's new at the zoo?
On being a photojournalist
Some pictures of Manassas
Finishing a picture
Watching the sunset in Adams Morgan
A night at the circus - 1966
Fortune Qwerkies (tm) -- Fortune cookies for the smartphone user
Art in the 3rd Dimension -- The evolution from flat to solid
Art in the 3rd Dimension -- Showing how the pieces fit together
Getting a grip on the Panasonic DMC-LF1
Some random thoughts about the Panasonic DMC-LF1
The Panasonic DMC-LF1 is a game-changer
Art and the Zen of QR Codes -- Making QaRt
A new process for printing art in the 3rd dimension
Bubbles! Bubbles! Bubbles!
Photographing the Perry Como Show
Hiking at Sky Meadows with my Panasonic DMC-ZS20
Working for the union
A new take on JPEG vs raw - Panasonic DMC-ZS20
Some pictures from my Panasonic DMC-ZS20 - Part 2
Some pictures from my Panasonic DMC-ZS20 - Part 1
My new go-everywhere camera - Panasonic DMC-ZS20
My brief life in the studio
Shooting Shakespeare - The Tempest - NBC, 1960
Impressionist bees
In the studio with Roz Kelly
At the Peppermint Lounge - 1962
An evening with Gene Kelly
A portrait of Donna Mitchell - Variations on a theme
The "Sky Dream Ultimate" plug-in from Wilkington-Smythe
There's a 3D object on this page and why you can't see it
Post-processing: Going from good to great
Winter pictures from my Panasonic DMC-FZ150
Using the Panasonic DMC-FZ150's "Photo Style" Menu
A valentine for the Artist's Muse
The Panasonic DMC-FZ150's controls
Some thoughts on the Panasonic DMC-FZ150 - Part 2
The Panasonic DMC-FZ150 - A cure for DSLR envy?
Some thoughts about my Panasonic DMC-FZ150 - Part 1
The Panasonic DMC-FZ150 -- Best camera ever?
Sunglasses - What can you add to a picture?
Hey, camera makers. If my smartphone can do this…
The Artmuse Variations - a look inside my new book
A tribute to George Washington on Veterans Day
A visit to the White House
The little farmhouse, the tractor, and the interesting tree
Buckminster, the baby buckeye butterfly
Memories of September 11
Happy Corporation Day!
A trip to Monterey and San Francisco
The first battle of the American Civil War -- 150 years ago
The end of an era -- The last American manned mission
Growing an Italian stone pine tree
Random thoughts on art and other stuff - From my new book
Playing with a classic - Sony DSC-R1 - Part 3, Warrenton
Playing with a classic - Sony DSC-R1 - Part 2, In the house
Playing with a classic - Sony DSC-R1 - Part 1, Winter
Some recent pictures
Fixing a Panasonic DMC-FZ18/FZ28/FZ35 problem
Into the world of shadows
Snowbound!
A walk through Warrenton
Partly moony with my Panasonic DMC-FZ35
My new Panasonic DMC-FZ35 - Part 3 - Video
Some pictures from my Panasonic DMC-FZ35 - Part 2
Happy birthday to muse...
Pixels and parking lots -- The Panasonic FZ35
Some pictures from my Panasonic DMC-FZ35
My new Panasonic DMC-FZ35 - Part 2
My new Panasonic DMC-FZ35 - Part 1
On our way to Warrenton
Evolution of an Iris
A new feature in Adobe Camera Raw 5.4
A tribute to the Apollo 11 astronauts
The pole dancer - Variations on a theme
Restoring lost highlight detail in JPEG images
A short course in photography in ten easy lessons
Kodachrome memories
A walk in the woods on my birthday
Mythbusters - More raw vs JPEG myths
Restoring lost shadow detail in JPEG images
Action!!
Expose for the highlights, develop for the shadows
Something new -- Interchangeable cameras
Honey, I shrunk the newspaper - The "Nano" NY Times
Mistaking evolution for revolution
Some pictures from the artist's muse
Photography becomes art -- Daibutsu Buddha at Kamakura
Happy House-i-versary
25 random things about the artist's muse
It happened at the Met
Some pictures and some settings - Part 4 - DMC-FZ28
Some pictures and some settings - Part 3 - DMC-FZ28
Some pictures and some settings - Part 2 - DMC-FZ28
Some pictures and some settings - Panasonic DMC-FZ28
Noiseography -- A new photographic technique
Shooting infrared with the Panasonic DMC-FZ28
You're never too young
One month with the Panasonic DMC-FZ28
A trip to Berryville - Panasonic DMC-FZ28
It's the Hobbitt's birthday
On September 11th
Shooting Tri-X with the Panasonic DMC-FZ28
A shot in the dark - Panasonic DMC-FZ28
Sunset and the far-up lens -- Panasonic DMC-FZ18
Further musings on the Panasonic DMC-FZ28
Customizing your camera for high-ISO photography
Panasonic DMC-FZ28 vs DMC-FZ18 at high ISO
Some musings about the Panasonic DMC-FZ28
Hummers, SUVs, DSLRs, and my DMC-FZ28
Panasonic DMC-FZ28 -- At the Flying Circus
Panasonic DMC-FZ28 -- The journey begins
Farewell, my Panasonic DMC-FZ18
More about the settings for the DMC-FZ18
Dealing with the modes and settings of the DMC-FZ18
Photography becomes art - Bird on a wire
The artist's muse at sunset -- DMC-FZ18
Do you need fancy equipment?
Now here's my plan
Good cookie, bad cookie
But seriously, folks...
Post-processing Mr. Squirrel
A museum of one's own
We need new words to describe what's happening
Going over to the dark side
Shooting the moon
Happy Anniversary, Hobbitt
The view from my window - DMC-FZ18
My favorite museum
A toast to the artist's muse
The DMC-FZ18, a sunset, and a glass of beer
Remembering Herbert Keppler
Shooting abstracts with the Panasonic DMC-FZ18
Fixing a Panasonic DMC-FZ18 problem
More pictures from my Panasonic DMC-FZ18
The journey of a thousand Melvins
Stairway to the stars -- Extreme post processing
DMC-FZ18 - Raw vs JPEG - The JPEG Manifesto
Chromatic aberration and the DMC-FZ18
Raw vs JPEG, the DMC-FZ18, and a mystery
Some pictures from my Kodak P880 - Part 2
Some pictures from my Panasonic DMC-FZ18
Some pictures from my Kodak P880 - Part 1
DMC-FZ18 - Don't be afraid of the dark
Shooting in "Medium" - DMC-FZ18 - The right exposure
Shooting in "Medium" and the Panasonic DMC-FZ18
In-use review -- Panasonic DMC-FZ18 - Part 2
In-use review -- Panasonic DMC-FZ18 - Part 1
Photography becomes art - Fantasy at Ida Lee
Photography becomes art - The chefs at Little Washington
My new old camera - the Kodak Easyshare P880
Photography becomes art - Variations on a theme
Doing the impossible - Part 4 - The final result
Doing the impossible - Part 3 - The solutions
Doing the impossible - Part 2 - The challenges
Doing the impossible - Part 1 - The Godfather
All the (art) news that's fit to print
The museum becomes art - #1
Photography becomes art - Making an angel
How to test a camera
Hitting the wall
Extreme post-processing - Working with infrared
Blogging 2.0 - A new interface
A funny thing happened on my way to the blog
In the beginning...